Tennis was the only sport I really enjoyed and I remember as a boy playing each summer in the Peel Forest Tennis Tournament. Peel Forest was our local village. My performance was adequate unlike that of my elder brother who was very competitive and very good indeed. 

My mother had played for her school and was Captain of Tennis. I remember old school photos of her in the Woodford House Tennis Team. She was also Captain of Hockey.  I did not inherit the sporting gene.

In the 1980’s when I was working in a parish in Kensington I used to be given tickets to the Centre Court at Wimbledon including for the men’s final. Sorry, ‘Gentlemen’s Singles’, it’s Wimbledon and there words as well as manners are important. An elderly parishioner had, I think, inherited tickets for Centre Court seats and she, being elderly and no longer wanting to go to Wimbledon herself would give some to me.

This year, being elderly myself, I’ve been watching Wimbledon on the television. It’s wonderful. Not the same as being there but still wonderful and without the hassle of getting there and getting home again. A Thai friend has been staying, himself a very capable tennis player until his knee gave way, and he has been asking awkward questions.

“Why ‘love’?” and, “Why fifteen, thirty, forty?” Deuce makes a degree of sense but there was not much sense in the rest even after a little research. I did enjoy Google’s conclusion for ‘love’. It was something to the effect that even if you lose, ‘love’, you continue to play ‘for love of the game’.

At Wimbledon we see the best, the world’s tennis playing elite. At Lord’s there’s the Ashes with the elite of cricket from Australia and England playing there. I’m not watching that. I hated cricket at school. It was compulsory.

What puzzles me is that while these elites are to be celebrated, to be elitist is not. To be ‘Elitist’ is placed alongside being ‘Racist’ and ‘Sexist’. 

From the Oxford Dictionary. Elite:  a select group that is superior in terms of ability or qualities to the rest of a group or society.

To be the best seems very good to me even if I’m not.

From Roget’s Thesauras Synonyms for Elitist: highbrow, name-dropper, pompous person, stuffed shirt, stiff, pompous ass, social climber.

I understand that ‘Elitism’, another negative word, only came into being in the 1950s.

Changing words and changing meanings, it can be difficult to keep up, but more of that another time.

I knew Patrick as an adult. He was the uncle of school friends of mine. When Patrick was a boy he wanted to be a clock. Much of the time he went, ‘Tick, Tock,’ and, I understand, would sometimes chime the hours.

One day after nearly two years of being a clock Patrick said to his Grandmother, “Granny, I think I’ve wound down. Would you please wind me up again?”

To which his Grandmother replied, “No Patrick I don’t believe I will.” And Patrick never ticked again.

From Joyce Grenfell’s Nursery School Storytime:

‘Come along everybody. Sidney come out from under the table and join in the fun. No, you’re not in a space rocket. You can’t wait for the count-down, you come out now. Don’t you want to help us tell our nice story, Sidney? Then say, No, thank you.’ And stop machine-gunning everybody, please. And Neville, stop being a train and sit down. All right then, get into the station and then sit down. George…. No!…’

I never wanted to be a clock, nor a train or to be in a space rocket. And I certainly did not want to be a farmer which many of my male contemporaries did want and, for better or worse, became, farmers.

I can’t remember ever wanting to be a priest. However some years ago I was talking to Cousin Mary here in London and said to her, “I suppose I must have been about eight when you first visited us in New Zealand.”

“Nonsense!” She said. Cousin Mary could be quite forthright. “You were six. I remember it quite clearly. You were playing in a sand pit. And you were not making sand castles you were making sand churches. I thought it most peculiar.”

And I ended up a priest. However it was not simply a matter of out of the sand pit and into a clerical collar. And it was more than twenty years later.

There was quite a lot of ‘winding up’ in between. Apart from other travels, work and wondering and some agonising and soul searching on my part there was also a good deal of that from the Bishop and various committees as well.  And there was Theological College for nearly three years.

Had the Bishop decided not to ‘wind me up’, had that childhood imagination or dream not been recognised as valid, my sand churches like the steam engine or the rocket would have been as playtime, nothing more, nothing less.

Perhaps we need to let them work through these notions without affirmation or condemnation permitting ourselves the occasional morsel of silent and ambivalent collusion.

At my first session in the Strength and Balance class last week I made several discoveries. One was that I am very deaf even with my hearing aids in and on. 

There were ten in the class which takes place in a large studio on the second floor of the Castle Centre. One long wall is all glass windows with a view of St Mary’s churchyard – now a small park. The opposite wall is all mirrors. In between is the studio. 

There were five chairs in a line in front, ten behind. We each stood behind our chairs our backs to the mirrors. Our instructor, Jeff, a young Yul Brynner look alike, shaved head, faced us with his back to the windows. I was in the back row to the left. He began the class and I couldn’t hear. I put my hand to my ear to help my hearing. Jeff noticed. A helpful friend, centre in the front row, offered to change places. We did. I was now centre front and could see and hear.

My second discovery was that I don’t like being in the front row. Now that I think about it I didn’t like it when I was at school. I now understand why people don’t like being in the front row in church. I felt very exposed, probably because I was. I was very aware that my friend, now back left, could observe every move I made. So could everyone else. Not that they were looking or particularly interested. Nevertheless I didn’t like the exposure.

We began with ‘warm up’ then ‘cardio’. There was a lot of marching on the spot arms moving in time. My arms didn’t seem to coordinate in time with my legs. I remembered cadets at boarding school on Fridays, ‘Right Dress’, and marching on the Quad. My arms and legs didn’t coordinate then either. Some things never change.

I did not enjoy this not least because I couldn’t see how I was doing in comparison with everyone else. I could only see Jeff who could do everything of course – he was the instructor. However I didn’t do too badly. When we moved on to exercises and were doing ‘squats’ Jeff said, “Well done, Simon.” 

I was pleased. I discovered then that the schoolboy in me still enjoys approval. I had hated gym at school and all these years later I was pleased that I was doing something right in the gym. Well, not in the gym exactly, in the studio on the second floor of the Castle Centre at a session for those older persons with strength and balance problems referred within the National Health Service.

And the next discovery was that there are still discoveries to be made.  I think that’s the great discovery.

It is not that I stopped thinking. I stopped writing. Then a friend said she missed my ‘Thoughts’ and that I should start writing again. So here goes.

To some extent the silence has been a matter of health rather than laziness. I could write about my Deep Vein Thrombosis in Bangkok and the wonderful Bangkok Christian Hospital.

Then there’s my Heart and Harley Street and being transferred from there to the NHS and St Thomas’s Hospital where both my grandparents practised, one as a Gynaecological Surgeon the other as a nurse. But that was in the late 1800s and Florence Nightingale was still around.

Then again I could choose to write about my x-ray, my Lungs, and the Chest Clinic in the Lambeth Wing at St Thomas’s.

There has also been my appointment at Guy’s Hospital at the Older Persons Assessment Unit (Cardiology). At the end of my late afternoon appointment the Consultant told me that I was the fittest patient he had seen all day. I replied that having observed the other patients in the waiting room his comment was hardly a compliment.

And there’s the Strength and Balance class at the Castle Centre at Elephant and Castle. It’s on the NHS. The first session was on Tuesday. It was hard work and I ended up exhausted and ready to fall over – unbalanced and weak. There are only twenty nine more sessions to go. Perhaps strength and balance will come.

I remember someone saying to me when I was talking about matters of health, “The organ recital will be limited to four minutes.” I think I’ve had my four minutes.

Through all of this I have experienced Britain’s National Health Service as never before. Of course my experience has been limited to my local area, local GP surgery and local hospitals Guy’s and Thomas’s. I’ve been to Accident and Emergency, not in an ambulance but in the 159 bus having been sent there by my GP for blood tests.

Without exception I have been treated by professionals with respect and efficiency. There have been delays but these haven’t affected me too much. I was less upset at the wait at A & E on Good Friday afternoon than the young woman who had hurt her foot and was wanting to go to a party. She was dressed up and ready to go and made her displeasure at the delay known. But there were others before her and the staff were remarkably patient.

The only news I get is from the television. My mistake I’m sure. The NHS had largely positive coverage during Covid. Now it’s the deficiencies, the rogue doctors and bad nursing, poor systems and inadequate funding that get a lot of attention on the television news. And I’m sure there are mistakes and poor judgements made and unsatisfactory practice from time to time.

The King’s Fund is an independent charitable organisation working to improve health and care in England. I discover in a report from the Fund that, ‘In 2021/22 there were an estimated 570 million patient interactions with GP, community, hospital, mental health and ambulance services – 1.6 million contacts every day‘. That’s for the NHS in England. I understand the number is increasing. Not surprising when I consider the number of contacts I’ve made with the NHS over the past six months.

There’s a thought.

It was somewhere in America in the eighties that they did this experiment. But neither the date nor the place matters at all. I probably read about it in the eighties.

A production line was set up. Chairs were before the conveyor belt of the production line. Behind each chair stood a man in a white coat. Items moved along the conveyor belt. A simple assembly task was set. The volunteers were called in and each sat on a chair to perform the simple task.

In the first instance each man in a white coat commented to each volunteer, always accurately, whenever the volunteer made a mistake. ‘No,’ ‘Incorrect,’ ‘Wrong,’ And so on.

In the second instance the set up was the same but this time the feedback, always accurately, whenever the volunteer got it right, was positive. ‘Yes,’ ‘Correct,’ And so on.

When the results were analysed the number of items correctly assembled by the first group decreased as time went on, the conveyor belt slowed and two of the volunteers burst into tears. For the second group the reverse happened, many more items were correctly assembled and there were happy volunteers apart from one who said, “This is the most boring thing I’ve done in my life. Don’t you realise that if you did this and this and this the whole process would be speeded up and you’d get far more done!”

I’ve been looking at the BBC News website. The BBC claims to present us with ‘balanced’ news. There are usually between ten and twelve general news items at any one time on the website. The great majority of news items are negative. There are stories of disaster, murder, stabbing, attacking – physical or verbal, warnings of economic downturn, higher prices for utilities, there are items about war and forest fires. And in one story “One quarter of people on the scheme do not wish to continue.” But what about the three quarters who do wish to continue with the scheme? The news seems to suggest the scheme is a failure. Is it? Three quarters are continuing. But the news item is the quarter who are not. The news does not, to me, seem balanced between positive and negative.

As a whole society we are being given negative feedback about ourselves on the hour every hour. It’s not healthy.

Don’t believe me? Try this:

‘Positive Feedback and Performance
Feedback can be defined as the “provision of information regarding some aspect(s) of one’s task performance” (Kluger and DeNisi, 1996, p. 255). Meta-analyses show impressive effects of feedback on increased performance, with average effect sizes of d = 0.40 (Kluger and DeNisi, 1996) and d = 0.79 (Hattie and Timperley, 2007). Research has identified moderators of the feedback-performance relationship, with findings suggesting that positive feedback is more efficient than negative feedback. For example, Arbel et al. (2014) found that positive feedback improved learning performance more than negative feedback. Furthermore, it has been found that feedback after good trials enhanced learning in comparison to feedback after poor trials (Chiviacowsky and Wulf, 2007). In line with these findings, the meta-analysis of Kluger and DeNisi (1996) found that feedback following correct results, that is, positive feedback, was more effective than feedback following incorrect results. Furthermore, feedback was more effective when it was provided by a computer (d = 0.41) vs. not (d = 0.23; Kluger and DeNisi, 1996).’

P.S. But perhaps I shouldn’t worry because I understand that viewing/listening figures for the BBC have been going steadily down for years. Thank goodness the BBC is about more than the news. The BBC Proms have been wonderful and the reviews (feedback?) have been great.